New Build

Local Council: Maidstone

Appeal Result: Allowed (Permission Granted)

Description: Demolition of garage and erection of a detached dwelling including associated and alterations to existing parking and landscaping

Refusal Stated: "The proposal by reason of the plot size, site layout, building footprint, height and prominent corner location would result in a cramped development that would be unsympathetic and harmful to the character and appearance of the area, with the proposal introducing an urban type of development into a suburban/semi-rural (Pleasant Lane) area which would fail to reflect the established local pattern of development. The development is contrary to Maidstone Borough Local Plan Review (2024) policies LPRSP15 and LPRHOU2, policy HD1 of the North Loose Road Neighbourhood Development Plan (2015-2031) and guidance within the NPPF (2023)."

Background: This site had previously been refused by Maidstone Council for a substantial two-storey extension, which was overturned by LSE at appeal. Building on this success, the developer proposed an additional detached dwelling within the curtilage of the host site. However, this too was resisted by the local authority, with the Council citing concerns that the development would appear cramped, unsympathetic to the character of the area, and disruptive to the suburban/semi-rural context. 

After an initial consultation, LSE determined that the Council's decision was unjustified. Our team prepared a detailed appeal statement that addressed these concerns, highlighting inconsistencies in the Council’s assessment, particularly regarding the established local pattern of development and plot sizes. The proposed dwelling was carefully designed to complement the surrounding area, with its massing, scale, and material palette informed by local context. Furthermore, the planning history of the site, including the previously allowed two-storey development, demonstrated clear alignment with established precedents. 

This robust strategy proved effective, as the Inspectorate agreed with LSE’s arguments, overturning the Council’s decision and granting permission. This success not only allowed the client to move forward with their plans but also underscored the importance of challenging unjustified refusals through meticulous case preparation and strategic advocacy. Another win for LSE, leaving the client both relieved and delighted!